Reier's process, while unclear to the public, was developed at a research facility in Utah, which he owns all permits for but which was otherwise left very much quiet during its design. Reier gave a tour of the premises but did not explain much of the science behind his findings, stating instead that his team still needed that information in order to apply their findings to practcal uses, such as automobiles and home usage.
No responses from any other energy corporation have been made at the time of this writing. Notably, for perhaps the first time in his tenure, Ark CEO Christian Moynahan could not be reached for comment.
Post by Hatire Carrington on Sept 26, 2015 17:21:28 GMT -5
Time Lord
I don't get it, how did Reier do this when Vital and Ark have been trying to do the same thing for years? If their engineers hadn't nailed down the science on such an achievement with such an advantage, how did Reier's group do it? Corporate espionage, did engineers defect? Something is off about this...
Post by Christian Moynahan on Oct 1, 2015 19:55:39 GMT -5
Parallax
I find myself in agreement with the above commenter. There was no indication that Reier had the technology or expertise to surpass his competitors so quickly and so completely. He had land, a bit of practice in Europe, and little else. No, there is certainly something "off" about this. But I would not merely be concerned. I would be afraid.